Swimmer's mission: Clean river
By Dan Hassert
The Cincinnatti Post staff reporter
Lynne Cox battled sharks while swimming off the Cape of Good Hope,
fended off animal carcasses in the Nile and endured brain-chilling
water in the Bering Strait.
But the prospect of swimming the Ohio River makes Cox, the California
resident who is probably the world's most famous open-water swimmer,
a bit nervous.
She's heard stories about the Ohio and wonders about its cleanliness,
having no desire to catch dysentery again.
"I got so sick I almost died. It was no joke at all," Cox
said about her swim in the Nile.
But Cox is determined to make a point: Taken care of, our rivers are
important for recreation and tourism.
In the middle of a tour to tout her books "Swimming to Antarctica" and "Grayson" -
about swimming with a baby gray whale - Cox has been invited by two
environmental groups, Rivers Unlimited and the Sierra Club, to help
build opposition to a proposal to lower pollution standards in the
river after heavy rains.
On Saturday afternoon, Cox will give a speech at the Serpentine Wall
at Sawyer Point downtown, then join with four local swimmers in an
aquatic trip to the Kentucky shore and back.
"We're staking our claim on the water as citizens who enjoy the
river for recreational opportunities," said Nate Holscher, project
coordinator for Rivers Unlimited. "Obviously, the river is used
to haul goods and (drain) our sewage, but it's more than that."
The event is part of a yearlong debate over proposals by the Ohio
River Valley Water Sanitation Commission to suspend bacterial standards
in the river for two days after heavy rains. ORSANCO, the eight-state
commission set up to improve water quality in the 981-mile-long Ohio,
says it's motivated by the desire to make the most efficient use of
taxpayer dollars.
The standards are frequently violated because of two factors: Heavy
rain overwhelms the region's sanitary sewer systems, causing them to
overflow into the river, and rain washes animal feces off farms into
streams and on to the river.
ORSANCO maintains that the standards are unreachable during those
times, and that adhering to them in such situations is pointless anyway
because few people are using the river for swimming, canoeing and skiing
when the current is swollen by rain.
The so-called wet-weather controversy is the local version of one
that's been going on nationally almost since the creation of the Clean
Water Act in 1972.
To some extent, the outcome of the discussion locally could affect
how the region carries out two agreements with the federal government
that require $2.4 billion to be spent over the next couple of decades
in sewer upgrades.
Critics like Holscher say ORSANCO's argument both downplays how often
the river is used for recreation and negates the importance of the
river's image.
"When you have sewage overflows during wet weather, it affects
public perception year-round," Holscher said.
Earlier this year, ORSANCO's board gave preliminary approval to the
seven recommendations written by its technical committee so that they
could be sent out for formal public comment. That comment period ended
May 31.
The agency was overwhelmed with negative responses to the proposals,
so many that it will likely delay a plan for a formal vote in October,
said Peter Tennant, deputy executive director of the agency.
"We got people pretty worked up," Tennant said. "We
haven't seen this kind of response in anything we've ever done."
ORSANCO received 4,476 postcards, 855 letters and 1,838 e-mails addressing
its wet-weather recommendations, he said. "Typically we get maybe
10."
Tennant said many of the responses mischaracterized what the agency
is trying to do. But others raised legitimate questions about the research
upon which the recommendations were based, he said.
For example, the federal Environmental Protection Agency studies that
link bacteria counts and infectious diseases are based on beaches and
lakes, not rivers, Tennant said. In addition, the 2 mph velocity at
which the new standards would kick in was an arbitrary number geared
toward swimmers, when the river is used mostly by boaters and jet-skiers,
he said.
It's likely that the technical committee will decide in a teleconference
call later this month to send the staff back for more research with
the possibility of modifying the proposed changes, he said.
Cox, the author and swimmer, said she's horrified by the prospect
of "going backward" on pollution standards in "sacred" waterways,
whether it's in the Ohio River or her home state of California. |
|
On August 5, 2006, the Sierra
Club and Rivers Unlimited in Cincinnati asked me to swim across
the Ohio River with four local swimmers: Aaron Rourke, Stephanie
Ross, Gail Pille, and Steve Morgan. Our goal was to bring attention
to the people who live along the Ohio River that water in the Ohio
is a great place for swimming, canoing, kayaking, and boating when
the weather is fair. But when it rains, the sewer systems that
edge the river are over taxed and sewage is dumped directly into
the river. This contamination makes the river unsafe for recreational
activities, but worse, the Ohio River is the source of drinking
water for many people in Cincinnati and people down stream. Fortunately
the conditions on August 5th were perfect.
Mark Mallory, the Mayor of Cincinnati, who supports
clean water for Cincinnati, met us at the Serpentine Wall. He introduced
us and gave us a great send off. There were surprises too: Ross Wales,
who I swam with thirty years ago, and who kayaks on the river, and
who is now an attorney in Cincinnati, read about the swim in the
paper and came to the river to show his support. There were friends
from Cincinnati,
the Binders and Fuchs, and about two hundred from all over Cincinnati and Newport
and from the wonderful neighboring river towns who came to demonstrate their
support and give us a great send off.
There was one woman from Kentucky who was so intent on getting to the start
on time that one of the local policeman gave her an escort. And there was Helen,
a six year old swimmer who went to see
me at the Barnes and Noble to ask me to sign Grayson for her. We missed each
other, so her mom
brought her along to meet me.
Around 5:30 PM we set off from Cincinnati with escorts
boats piloted by Al Schleper and Tim Guilfoille and beside Brewster
Rhoads, our mighter kayaker. We also had terrific support from the
marine safety officers, police, and the US Coast Guard who keep boat
traffic at bay. We swam between the Purple People bridge and the
Robbeling bridge, a distance of perhaps a quarter of a mile. There
were people all along the shores of Newport, Kentucky demonstrating
their support to keep the Ohio River clean. They greeted us with
loud cheers, whistles, shouts and waves as we stepped into the soft
warm silt that line their shores. It was a really great swim and
great day of celebration.
It seemed like everything was ment to fit together.
Even on the flight back to California, something wonderful happened.
A group of swimmers from the Cincinnati Marlins who were on their
way to junior nationals in Irvine, California sat near me. Brian
and Jim, two of the great swimmers on the team, kept me smiling all
the way home. I was so impressed with their dedication as athletes
and students.
What a great representatives of their team and community. Go Marlins!
|